This file focuses on the Q05-versus-EX5 decision. Its approval points are production source, battery/charging, software language, with destination and commercial checks kept visible.
Decide the Q05-versus-EX5 decision
Create a side-by-side sheet for production country, steering side, battery, motor, connector, dimensions, safety equipment, language, smartphone integration and spare parts. Range labels must use the same test cycle or be treated separately.
Use the section outcome to decide whether production source is confirmed or needs another document before the candidate advances.
Evidence for the Q05-versus-EX5 decision
Evidence for the Q05-versus-EX5 decision should show Production source, Battery/charging and Software language in a consistent VIN-linked sequence, with unresolved points stated rather than inferred.
Save the supporting file under the candidate VIN and label how it establishes battery/charging; do not rely on an unreferenced chat image.
Destination test for the Q05-versus-EX5 decision
Confirm that Safety equipment and Parts support work in the buyer's country and that parts, diagnostics and legal use are practical there.
Record who will confirm safety equipment and by what date, because unresolved destination assumptions become expensive after loading.
Commercial control for the Q05-versus-EX5 decision
Normalise the Q05-versus-EX5 decision quotations by separating Total cost, China-side services and destination expenditure. Use a dated rate and written inclusions.
State the accepted result for safety equipment in the written approval record.
Apply the Q05-versus-EX5 decision to a candidate
Make the comparison destination-specific. Confirm which EX5 and Q05 variants are actually obtainable with the required steering side and connector, then compare official documents for that market. Record rear-seat space, luggage arrangement, battery, motor, charge curve, thermal management, wheel and tyre specification, safety systems, language and phone integration. Ask local workshops which vehicle they can diagnose and obtain parts for. If one model has an official local network while the other is an independent import, value that difference explicitly. Use the same freight, tax, registration and first-year maintenance boundary when comparing cost.
Turn this field method into a dated worksheet and keep it with the candidate record so a later reviewer can reproduce the decision.
Approve or reject the Q05-versus-EX5 decision
Retain the comparison date and official source links because equipment and support can change. Revisit the decision when a different market or trim enters the shortlist.
Retain the final outcome with the VIN file and reopen the review if the candidate, destination or commercial boundary changes.
Record the approval decision
Approve the Q05-versus-EX5 decision only when production source, battery/charging, software language are supported by candidate-specific evidence and safety equipment, parts support, total cost have an identified owner. Pause if the seller will not connect the VIN to the vehicle, documents or condition record, or if the destination answer depends only on another market's brochure. Record the precise missing test, quotation line or document. Resolve it before payment or reject the candidate; do not carry an undefined technical or commercial issue into shipping.
undefined
Buyer approval checklist
Use these fields as a candidate-specific decision record. Assign each unresolved item before approving payment or shipment.
- Production source
- Battery/charging
- Software language
- Safety equipment
- Parts support
- Total cost
Changan NEVO Q05 vs Geely EX5 for Export Buyers: buyer questions
Can brochure specifications be compared directly?
Only when market, model year, trim and test cycle align. Otherwise record the differences rather than normalising them silently.
Why compare software as well as hardware?
Language, smartphone integration, account region, navigation and OTA support can materially change overseas ownership.
Which quotation is the stronger offer?
The one with verified vehicle identity, destination-compatible equipment, supportable systems and a complete commercial boundary.